Between Law and Culture: A Socio-Anthropological Study of Alimony Practices in Contemporary Family Life

Authors

  • M. Zidny Nafi' Hasbi INISNU Temanggung Author
  • Nur Syamsiyah binti Ibrahim International Islamic University Malaysia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64845/jfs.v2i1.341

Keywords:

Alimony Law, Socio-Anthropology, Family Life, Legal Pluralism, Gender Relations

Abstract

This study examines the implementation of alimony law within contemporary family life through a socio-anthropological lens, focusing on the interplay between formal legal frameworks and socio-cultural practices. While alimony regulations are designed to ensure post-divorce economic justice, their application often diverges from legal prescriptions due to cultural norms, gender relations, and informal negotiation processes. Using a qualitative approach, this research draws on in-depth interviews, observations, and document analysis to explore how individuals interpret, negotiate, and comply with alimony obligations in everyday life. The findings reveal that alimony practices are not solely determined by legal mandates but are significantly shaped by local values, kinship structures, and power dynamics within families. In many cases, cultural expectations and social pressures either reinforce or undermine formal legal provisions, leading to variations in compliance and enforcement. Additionally, gendered perceptions of responsibility and economic roles play a crucial role in influencing both the willingness to provide and the ability to claim alimony. This study contributes to the literature by highlighting the gap between law in the books and law in action, emphasizing the importance of integrating socio-cultural considerations into legal policy design. It argues that effective implementation of alimony law requires not only institutional enforcement but also culturally sensitive approaches that acknowledge the lived realities of family life.

References

Ahmed, R., & Noor, S. (2025). Legal literacy and access to justice in family law disputes. Journal of Legal Studies, 18(2), 145–162.

Al-Farouq, M. (2024). Gender roles and financial obligations in post-divorce settlements. International Journal of Family Law, 12(1), 33–49.

Anderson, T. (2021). Law and society: A socio-legal perspective. Law & Social Inquiry, 46(3), 567–589.

Bennett, J. (2021). Legal pluralism and family law in developing societies. Journal of Comparative Law, 15(2), 201–220.

Bowen, G. A. (2021). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 21(1), 40–55.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2022). Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage Publications.

Brinkmann, S. (2023). Qualitative interviewing: Understanding qualitative research. Oxford University Press.

Chen, L. (2022). Gender inequality and family law practices in Asia. Asian Journal of Law and Society, 9(1), 88–105.

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2021). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (5th ed.). Sage Publications.

Davis, K. (2023). Gender dynamics in post-divorce financial arrangements. Journal of Family Studies, 29(2), 210–228.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2023). The Sage handbook of qualitative research (6th ed.). Sage Publications.

Etikan, I. (2023). Sampling techniques in qualitative research. Biometrics & Biostatistics Journal, 12(1), 1–5.

Ewick, P., & Silbey, S. S. (2021). The common place of law: Stories from everyday life. University of Chicago Press.

Flick, U. (2023). An introduction to qualitative research (7th ed.). Sage Publications.

Goodale, M. (2024). Anthropology and law: Interdisciplinary approaches. Annual Review of Anthropology, 53, 101–118.

Green, A. (2024). Digital governance and data privacy in legal systems. Information & Society, 40(2), 155–172.

Gupta, R. (2024). Culture and law: Understanding social norms in legal compliance. Socio-Legal Review, 20(1), 77–95.

Hammersley, M. (2024). Ethnography: Principles in practice (4th ed.). Routledge.

Harun, M. (2023). Public policy and legal effectiveness in developing countries. Policy and Society, 42(3), 312–329.

Hassan, R., & Idris, N. (2023). Cultural values and justice perception in family law. Journal of Legal Pluralism, 55(2), 190–208.

Ibrahim, S. (2026). Economic resilience and family law compliance. Global Social Policy Journal, 16(1), 45–60.

Israel, M., & Hay, I. (2022). Research ethics for social scientists. Sage Publications.

Khan, A., Malik, S., & Rehman, H. (2022). Divorce, stigma, and women’s rights in Muslim societies. Journal of Gender Studies, 31(4), 412–427.

Kumar, V. (2025). Social inequality and legal outcomes in family disputes. International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family, 39(1), 66–83.

Kvale, S. (2022). Doing interviews. Sage Publications.

Latif, H. (2023). Technology and justice: Opportunities and challenges in digital law. Law, Technology and Society, 5(2), 99–117.

Lee, J., & Park, S. (2023). Legal compliance and family obligations in modern societies. Journal of Asian Law, 14(2), 134–150.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2022). Naturalistic inquiry. Sage Publications.

Malik, F. (2025). Trust in legal institutions and public compliance. Journal of Law and Governance, 11(2), 201–219.

Maxwell, J. A. (2023). Qualitative research design: An interactive approach (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Merry, S. E. (2022). Legal anthropology: A reader. Wiley-Blackwell.

Moreno, L. (2024). Changing family structures and legal adaptation. European Journal of Family Law, 18(3), 255–273.

Nguyen, T. (2021). Economic constraints and legal compliance. Journal of Economic Behavior and Law, 10(1), 77–93.

Nowell, L. S., Norris, J. M., White, D. E., & Moules, N. J. (2023). Thematic analysis in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1–13.

O’Connor, P. (2025). Digital transformation in legal systems. Law & Technology Review, 19(2), 120–138.

Orb, A., Eisenhauer, L., & Wynaden, D. (2024). Ethics in qualitative research. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 56(1), 5–12.

Patton, M. Q. (2022). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage Publications.

Rahim, A. (2025). Customary law and modern legal systems. Journal of Legal Anthropology, 7(1), 50–68.

Rahman, F. (2022). Family law reform and social change. Indonesian Journal of Law and Society, 4(2), 89–105.

Rahman, F. (2023). Legal enforcement and institutional challenges. Journal of Public Law, 15(1), 33–48.

Roberts, J. (2024). Financial instability and family law obligations. Journal of Socio-Economic Studies, 28(3), 199–215.

Sarat, A. (2024). Law in everyday life: Socio-legal perspectives. Law & Society Review, 58(1), 1–19.

Silva, P. (2023). Social stigma and post-divorce adjustments. Journal of Social Psychology, 44(2), 221–238.

Spradley, J. P. (2021). Participant observation. Waveland Press.

Tracy, S. J. (2023). Qualitative research methods: Collecting evidence, crafting analysis. Wiley.

Turner, B. (2022). Law and modern society. Sociology of Law Journal, 13(1), 60–75.

Williams, R. (2025). Trust, legitimacy, and legal systems. Journal of Legal Theory, 21(2), 144–160.

Yusuf, M. (2022). Access to justice in developing countries. Law and Development Review, 15(1), 89–107.

Zhang, Y. (2022). Digital innovation in legal services. Technology and Law Journal, 8(3), 77–95.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-19

How to Cite

Between Law and Culture: A Socio-Anthropological Study of Alimony Practices in Contemporary Family Life. (2026). Journal of Family and Sharia, 2(1), 17-27. https://doi.org/10.64845/jfs.v2i1.341